After the strike, the network was awakened with praise of the network, as a series of guests prepared to please the President. Today we will discuss about American attacks trump dishes against Iran.
American attacks trump dishes against Iran
In the last weekend, Iran’s US bombing inspired sobber reporting from mainstream American media, as well as considering whether the US has violated international law in attacking a foreign country.
However, Fox News treated a different behavior, making a war champion, according to the report, it helped to convince Donald Trump.
“This will go down as one of the biggest military victories in history,” on Saturday night, the most famous host of Fox News, Scene Hanti roared.
After the propagation of Trump’s White House address after the right -wing network, the Hanity continued in the same vein, which appreciated the attacks as a success.
“I agree with the President,” he said. “It is one of the most efficient, important, essential peace, peace-power-power-re-regulation in the last 40 years, and is definitely the rule of terror in Iran, whether they know it or not, coming to a quick end.”
Hanniti, who said that he spoke to Trump before going into the air, then brought a orthodox dialogue Mark Levin, who reportedly urged Trump to allow Israel to attack Iran during a private lunch in early June.
Levine was not fair.
“You are looking at a historical figure,” Levin said about Trump. “We just kicked his ass.”
His voice is growing, Levin said: “They were manufacturing nuclear weapons to attack Islamo-Nazis, with intercontinental ballistic missiles.
American attacks trump dishes against Iran
Levin said, “This mission was never going to fail under this commander in Chief,” Before this conclusion: “It is historic, it is historical, the United States army is historical.”
It was understood that Fox will please the news strike. It spent days to support this idea. On 17 June, host Brian Kilmede pulled a map of all places attacking Iran – a map that included Germany, Italy and parts of the Middle East. After this, he some of all the rockets of Iran.
The Times reported, “President was closely monitoring the Fox News, praising the wall from the wall of Israel’s military operation and urging the guests to join Mr. Trump more,” Times said. It states that some of Trump’s colleagues “mourned” that Tucker Carlson, who has emerged as an anti-an interventionist voice, was no longer on the network.
The division between right -wing media has become clear. Many non-violences found themselves in the novel position to agree with Carlson, as they repeatedly stated in the days before the attacks that America should not join. On June 18, Carlson faced the Republican Senator Ted Cruise and said: “You don’t know anything about Iran!” In a memorable exchange.
But Fox News had the President’s ear, and with appreciation after the attacks, as a series of guests, several people were attacked in Iran, who were attacked, lines for champions Trump.
One of them was retired Israeli General Aamir Avi, who proposed to forcibly transfer Palestinians to Egypt.
“It was a great opportunity to end the war which was led by President Trump and thanks to him for his leadership.” Aviv said, saying that Trump made a “global preventive”.
Nevertheless, in the world of Maga, even the most smooth media organizations can definitely be certain about their notch.
The US Defense Secretary, Pete Hegseth, went into the Pentagon on Thursday, focused on the specific journalists who alleged that they were not enough in reporting the strike to Pravda.
“Jennifer, you were the worst,” Hegseth told Fox News reporter Jennifer Griffin, when he asked if the government was certain that the highly rich uranium was now removed from Fordo.
Continued to experiment with Grammar, Hegseth told Griffin that she was also: “He who deliberately presents wrongly.
For American colleagues and rivals around the world, Donald Trump’s strike on Iran has redefined the stone of the readiness of the White House, which is to use force in such direct interventions that the President said that he would talk about his separatist “America earlier” the past.
The President’s decision to launch the biggest strategic bombing strike in Europe from Russia and China in Europe and global south indicates a White House that is ready to employ the force abroad – but reluctantly and under the highly nature and unpredictable leadership of the President.
Trump said, “After Trump was able to work and ready to act, when he saw an opportunity, of course [Vladimir] would stop Putin,” Trump Hill, a former Trump National Security Advisor and one of the key writers of the UK strategic defense review said Fona Hill said.
While Trump has withdrawn from his earlier warnings about possible governance change in Iran, “It’s time of peace now!” Within 72 hours, he has yet reinforced the Russian perceptions of the United States as an unexpected and aggressive rival that will not unilaterally leave his ability to use force abroad.
Hill said, “It is a very serious warning for Putin that what can happen in the time of weakness,” Hill said. “This will just explain to Putin that the intention of the US President does not matter, the ability to destroy is something that is to be taken seriously.”
It also shows a change in calculus in Washington DC, where Hawks – along with Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel – was able to convince Trump that it was better to pursue dialogues that had not yet failed to start a strike on Iran.
This can be a knock-on impact for war in Ukraine, where Republican and Foreign Policy fundamentalists are more vocal about the need for putin attacks on cities and a strategy of a difficult restrictions on cities.
Nevertheless, his previous hesitation in using American force may be ready to assure Beijing that the US would not come to Taiwan’s direct assistance if a military conflict would break – a wild card that will probably be a lipad struggle between China and Taiwan.
Experts warned that bets were very different, and the conflict was far away, to make a direct conclusion about Trump’s readiness, if a struggle broke between China and Taiwan. Trump’s administration seems to be more entangled in the Middle East diplomacy, as much as wanted and its axis has also been delayed to focus on China.
And when some close to the army say that the strike has recently lost credibility after some failures, including a return from Afghanistan, others said that it does not send the same message to military planners in Moscow or Beijing.
We should not wish to use force to use force to prevent other types of struggles or use force when it is going to be incredibly expensive.